It was a rough night.
Crypto crashed and I got stopped out on a few positions. I do have a long open on BTC from $61.9k so let’s see if that one can bring some profits. I’ll dive more into the broader crypto prices later today — but right now I want to talk about the $LAB story, because it’s one of the most documented cases of insider manipulation and deliberate short hunting I’ve seen in this cycle.
Let’s break it all down.
What Is $LAB?
LAB is the native token of a project positioned as a multi-chain AI trading terminal. Sounds legitimate on the surface. AI narrative, real product pitch, big CEX listings. Binance, Bitget, Gate.io — all listed it. When the big exchanges list something, retail traders naturally assume it’s been vetted. That assumption is exactly what insiders count on.
The founders — Vova Sadkov and Mark — previously ran a project called Eesee that left investors burned. Same team, new token, same playbook.
The Insider Supply Problem
Here’s where it gets interesting.
On-chain investigator ZachXBT spent weeks digging into LAB’s token distribution and found something alarming: insiders likely control more than 95% of the circulating supply through a web of OTC deals, private sale allocations, airdrop wallets, and team holdings that were never publicly disclosed.
The official numbers don’t even add up. CoinGecko listed 76.5 million tokens in circulation. CoinMarketCap showed 309.9 million. The project’s own documents gave no clear breakdown. For reference, the actual figures are:
- Circulating Supply: 312,542,846 LAB
- Total Supply: 1,000,000,000 LAB
- Max Supply: 1,000,000,000 LAB
When you can’t even get a straight answer on how many tokens exist, that’s a red flag by itself.
Want to check token distribution yourself before trading anything? Arkham Intelligence is one of the best tools out there for this. You can check LAB’s full wallet distribution here — it’s great for spotting potential insider shenanigans before you risk real money.
The Pump to $28 and the $8.75B Market Cap
With 312.5 million tokens in circulation, a $28 price gave LAB a market cap of approximately $8.75 billion. The fully diluted valuation hit $28 billion.
$28 billion FDV for a token where insiders hold nearly everything. A number bigger than most legitimate top 20 projects in crypto.
That market cap was essentially fiction. A tiny amount of tokens traded between insiders to paint a number that looked credible to retail.
The Short Hunt
This is the part that really tells the full story.
A well-known trader publicly disclosed a large short position on $LAB. He had been watching the manipulation play out and was betting on the inevitable dump. His breakeven was around $3.77. The position had over $5 million in notional value.
What happened next was not random.
Insiders saw the public short, identified the target, and kept pushing the price higher. By the time $LAB hit $28, this trader was sitting on an unrealized loss of $3.4 million — down 65.73% on the position. With funding rates running at -2.5% (an insane level that means you are paying enormous fees just to stay short), holding became unsustainable.
He closed the trade and took a total loss of around $4.2 million.
His own words after closing: “I was the target. If I kept that position open they would have pushed it to $40 no question. This market hunts liquidity and I am not here to get wiped out completely. I closed to survive. That is how you stay in this game.”
He was right on the direction. The thesis was spot on. He just couldn’t survive the funding costs long enough for it to play out.
The Dump: $6.8 Billion Wiped in One Candle
Shortly after the short was closed, the dump came.
$LAB went from $28 to $6.30 in a single one-hour candle. That is a 77.5% drop in 60 minutes.
- Market cap at $28: ~$8.75 billion
- Market cap at $6.30: ~$1.97 billion
- Total wiped: ~$6.8 billion
Before the crash, ZachXBT had already flagged the warning signs. 100 million LAB tokens — worth around $480 million — had moved from Bitget into 10 freshly created wallets within a 12-hour window. He called it coordinated insider distribution. He also called on Bitget, Binance, and Gate.io to freeze insider profits and either redistribute them to users or delist LAB entirely.
At the time of writing, $LAB is trading at around $17. Still well off the highs, with 282 million tokens still locked and waiting to unlock.
The Bigger Pattern
ZachXBT and Bubblemaps have both noted this is not a one-off. Tokens like SKYAI, PIPPIN, RAVE, RIVER, and SIREN have all followed the same structure — low float, opaque supply, big CEX listings to create the illusion of legitimacy, retail piles in, insiders exit.
As ZachXBT put it: “Retail traders get baited in due to top CEX listings, trending lists, and high market caps which create the illusion of safety.”
A Binance listing is not due diligence. A $5 billion market cap is not proof of a legitimate project. On-chain data is.
What $LAB Teaches Every Trader
A few things to take away from this:
Never publicize a large short on a low-float insider-controlled token. If insiders control the supply, they can see where the pain is and push directly into it.
Funding rates are a signal. When funding on a short hits -2.5%, the market is telling you insiders are in full control and will keep squeezing until you’re gone.
Being right on direction does not save you. The trader who shorted $LAB was correct. He still lost $4.2 million because he couldn’t survive the drawdown long enough.
Always check token distribution before trading. Tools like Arkham, bubblemaps, and lookonchain exist for exactly this reason. If a handful of wallets hold almost everything, you are not trading a market — you are playing against a house that controls the cards.
Support Our Work
If you found this helpful, consider signing up on OKX or Bybit using our referral links. Your support keeps this content free and flowing.
Final Words
The $LAB story is not just about one bad token. It is a blueprint for how insider-controlled tokens operate in this market — manufactured legitimacy through big exchange listings, retail drawn in by impressive market caps, supply concentrated at the top, and large traders actively hunted before the exit.
The trader lost $4.2 million. Retail lost far more collectively. And the insiders walked away with hundreds of millions.
Stay sharp. Check the on-chain data. And if funding rates are screaming, listen to them.
I’ll be back later today with a look at the broader market and where prices are heading next.
If you enjoyed this blog, you may want to check our other crypto news updates.
As always, don’t forget to claim your bonus on OKX below. See you next time!
